‘Awkward reality’: Unlikely savior stopped Musk’s profit bloodbath from being even heftier
Hamza Adam 
Already facing the quandary of leading the nation’s largest electric vehicle maker while working as a senior adviser to EV-inimical, “drill, baby, drill” U.S. President Donald Trump, Tesla CEO Elon Musk was confronted Tuesday with an awkward reality.
Absent zero-emissions tax credits implemented during the Biden administration, his company would not have made any profit during the first quarter.
In fact, Tesla would have posted a Q1 loss without the $595 million in EV tax credits, according to reporting by TechCrunch. Earnings figures released by Tesla showed $409 million in net quarterly profit, a brutal 71% plunge from a year ago. These figures follow Tesla’s first-ever year-to-year sales decline. The company’s stock price has also plummeted more than 50% since December.
As Splinter editor-in-chief Jacob Weindling quipped on Bluesky, “Tesla is a carbon credit company that has a couple of cars for sale.”
Tesla earned $10.7 billion selling climate compliance tax credits over the past decade—a total that accounted for a third of the company’s profits during that period—according to an analysis published earlier this year by Politico‘s E&E News. Ironically, Trump has threatened to pull the plug on some of the taxpayer-funded credits that helped make Musk the world’s richest person.
“It is difficult to measure the impacts of shifting global trade policy on the automotive and energy supply chains, our cost structure, and demand for durable goods and related services,” Tesla said in a recent letter to investors. “While we are making prudent investments that will set up both our vehicle and energy businesses for growth, the rate of growth this year will depend on a variety of factors, including the rate of acceleration of our autonomy efforts, production ramp at our factories, and the broader macroeconomic environment.”
Tesla was already struggling before Musk—who poured hundreds of millions of dollars into Trump’s 2024 campaign coffers—was tapped by the president to be the de facto head of the highly controversial Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Factors including Trump’s tariff whiplash, growing public revulsion at Musk and his brands, and the rise of competitors like China’s BYD, the world’s leading EV manufacturer, have played roles in Tesla’s floundering fortunes.
“The more political he gets with DOGE, the more the brand suffers—there is no debate,” Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities said earlier this month in a note to investors. “This continues to be a moment of truth for Musk to navigate this brand tornado crisis moment.”
On a Tuesday call with jittery investors, Musk defended his DOGE work and said that people protesting his role in the government-eviscerating agency were “paid.” However, Musk added that he would start shifting his time and attention back to Tesla “I think starting probably next month.”
Earlier this month, dozens of House Democrats demanded that Trump “stop ignoring federal law and ethics rules to empower an unelected billionaire” and fire Musk by the end of May.
Ross Gerber, CEO of the investment firm Gerber Kawasaki, said on social media Tuesday: “I’ve done Tesla calls for 11 years. This is the worst performance I’ve seen in Tesla’s history.”
“I get Elon will tell everyone about trillions in [total addressable market] and robots taking over the world,” he added, “anything to get you not to look at the facts.”
New York City Councilmember Justin Brannan (D-47)—who wants to divest the more than $1 billion that municipal pension funds have invested in Tesla—said Tuesday that the company’s earnings “tanked because consumers are done with Elon Musk playing Trump’s sidekick and backing cuts to seniors and working families.”
“It’s not just against NYC values,” Brannan added. “Tesla is now a bad investment. We need to divest our city pensions from Tesla.”